Sears Tower Gets Renamed
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Sears Tower Gets Renamed
From Chicago Red Eye March 13 2009:
Changing the name of Sears Tower to Willis Tower is a no-brainer, especially if you're Willis Group Holdings.
Corporate naming rights, whether it's a stadium or an office tower, boil down to ego, marketing and money. And now a London-based insurance brokerage with practically zero name recognition with the public gets its name attached to the tallest building in the Western Hemisphere.
What's far less certain is whether loyal Chicagoans, as well as tourists, will allow the "Willis Tower" name to stick.
The immediate reaction was obvious outside the Wacker Drive skyscraper Thursday, shortly after Willis announced it secured naming rights to the tower as part of its deal to relocate area offices to three floors there. Cameras clicked away as word of the pending name change spread and people came to capture the Sears Tower name before it disappears in late July.
Many people, including hundreds chiming in online, appeared dead-set against embracing Sears Tower as anything different, despite the fact that the retailer it was named for left for the suburbs 17 years ago.
"I think it's terrible," said Jen King, 20, of Bartlett. "It's been the Sears Tower forever."
"It's just wrong," said her friend Audrey Joseph, 22, of St. Louis, shaking her head.
Joseph Plumeri, Willis Group's chairman and CEO, was incredulous at the negative reaction to his company's decision to relocate 500 employees to the tower in the midst of a recession.
"Would you rather have an iconic building with nobody in it, which doesn't say a lot about Chicago, or someone with enough faith to take the space?" he asked. "The headline should be: A company has decided to invest money in Chicago, and if you miss that headline, you've missed the side of the building by a mile and a half."
Earlier in the day, Willis spokesman Will Thoretz said, "Old habits die hard, but we feel that ultimately people will come to embrace the Willis name."
But in Chicago, say consumers and branding experts, it's just not that simple. This is a city with a deep appreciation of tradition and a healthy ego, where some Chicagoans still mourn the switch from Marshall Field's to Macy's.
Many White Sox fans still refer to their beloved team's ballpark as Comiskey rather than U.S. Cellular Field. Cubs owner Tribune Co. caused an uproar after news reports hinted at an effort to sell the naming rights to Wrigley Field.
"It's our strong Midwestern values," said D. Joel Whalen, an assistant professor of marketing at DePaul University. "We're friendly to everyone but we don't make friends quickly. It takes years to make a friend. You're from out of town and we don't know who you are."
When it was completed in 1973, the then-tallest building in the world became home to the then-largest retailer in the world, Sears, Roebuck and Co. Sears relocated to Hoffman Estates in 1992 but the name stayed behind.
Currently, 85 percent of the building is leased, and commercial real estate experts say a name change may help leasing efforts going forward, particularly as the tower tries to woo more international firms.
For the building's existing tenants, the name change will cause them to re-evaluate how they refer to their workplaces and, more importantly, how they direct visitors to their offices.
"I still refer to [ Aon Center] as the Standard Oil building, and I go to watch the White Sox at Comiskey Park," said Ronald Safer, managing partner at tower tenant Schiff Hardin LLP. He figures he'll tell clients his office can be found in "the structure formerly known as Sears Tower."
William Lozito, president of Strategic Name Development Inc., a Minneapolis-based consultancy, said Willis has an uphill battle on its hands, particularly because the Sears name is not being replaced with another familiar consumer brand. "I can predict for years people are going to call it Sears Tower because it's being replaced with an unknown."
Willis will lease 140,000 square feet of the 110-story skyscraper. Plumeri said he asked for, and received, the naming rights for free, a comment immediately disputed by U.S. Equities Realty, the tower's leasing and property management firm.
"We are extremely pleased with the economics of this deal," said senior vice president Mike Kazmierczak, adding there was "significant financial consideration" for the naming rights.
Mayor Daley shrugged his shoulders Thursday when reporters asked his thoughts on the name change. In the past, he has supported the renaming of such icons as Marshall Field's, and this seemed no different. "Sears moved out a long time ago," he said. RedEye contributed.
--
I am, to say the least, pissed. What do they think they'll earn from this? The hate of all Chicagoans? The loss of tourists there? "Big Willie" as a nickname? -__-
Changing the name of Sears Tower to Willis Tower is a no-brainer, especially if you're Willis Group Holdings.
Corporate naming rights, whether it's a stadium or an office tower, boil down to ego, marketing and money. And now a London-based insurance brokerage with practically zero name recognition with the public gets its name attached to the tallest building in the Western Hemisphere.
What's far less certain is whether loyal Chicagoans, as well as tourists, will allow the "Willis Tower" name to stick.
The immediate reaction was obvious outside the Wacker Drive skyscraper Thursday, shortly after Willis announced it secured naming rights to the tower as part of its deal to relocate area offices to three floors there. Cameras clicked away as word of the pending name change spread and people came to capture the Sears Tower name before it disappears in late July.
Many people, including hundreds chiming in online, appeared dead-set against embracing Sears Tower as anything different, despite the fact that the retailer it was named for left for the suburbs 17 years ago.
"I think it's terrible," said Jen King, 20, of Bartlett. "It's been the Sears Tower forever."
"It's just wrong," said her friend Audrey Joseph, 22, of St. Louis, shaking her head.
Joseph Plumeri, Willis Group's chairman and CEO, was incredulous at the negative reaction to his company's decision to relocate 500 employees to the tower in the midst of a recession.
"Would you rather have an iconic building with nobody in it, which doesn't say a lot about Chicago, or someone with enough faith to take the space?" he asked. "The headline should be: A company has decided to invest money in Chicago, and if you miss that headline, you've missed the side of the building by a mile and a half."
Earlier in the day, Willis spokesman Will Thoretz said, "Old habits die hard, but we feel that ultimately people will come to embrace the Willis name."
But in Chicago, say consumers and branding experts, it's just not that simple. This is a city with a deep appreciation of tradition and a healthy ego, where some Chicagoans still mourn the switch from Marshall Field's to Macy's.
Many White Sox fans still refer to their beloved team's ballpark as Comiskey rather than U.S. Cellular Field. Cubs owner Tribune Co. caused an uproar after news reports hinted at an effort to sell the naming rights to Wrigley Field.
"It's our strong Midwestern values," said D. Joel Whalen, an assistant professor of marketing at DePaul University. "We're friendly to everyone but we don't make friends quickly. It takes years to make a friend. You're from out of town and we don't know who you are."
When it was completed in 1973, the then-tallest building in the world became home to the then-largest retailer in the world, Sears, Roebuck and Co. Sears relocated to Hoffman Estates in 1992 but the name stayed behind.
Currently, 85 percent of the building is leased, and commercial real estate experts say a name change may help leasing efforts going forward, particularly as the tower tries to woo more international firms.
For the building's existing tenants, the name change will cause them to re-evaluate how they refer to their workplaces and, more importantly, how they direct visitors to their offices.
"I still refer to [ Aon Center] as the Standard Oil building, and I go to watch the White Sox at Comiskey Park," said Ronald Safer, managing partner at tower tenant Schiff Hardin LLP. He figures he'll tell clients his office can be found in "the structure formerly known as Sears Tower."
William Lozito, president of Strategic Name Development Inc., a Minneapolis-based consultancy, said Willis has an uphill battle on its hands, particularly because the Sears name is not being replaced with another familiar consumer brand. "I can predict for years people are going to call it Sears Tower because it's being replaced with an unknown."
Willis will lease 140,000 square feet of the 110-story skyscraper. Plumeri said he asked for, and received, the naming rights for free, a comment immediately disputed by U.S. Equities Realty, the tower's leasing and property management firm.
"We are extremely pleased with the economics of this deal," said senior vice president Mike Kazmierczak, adding there was "significant financial consideration" for the naming rights.
Mayor Daley shrugged his shoulders Thursday when reporters asked his thoughts on the name change. In the past, he has supported the renaming of such icons as Marshall Field's, and this seemed no different. "Sears moved out a long time ago," he said. RedEye contributed.
--
I am, to say the least, pissed. What do they think they'll earn from this? The hate of all Chicagoans? The loss of tourists there? "Big Willie" as a nickname? -__-
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
^ I SECOND THAT.
renaming it has to be the biggest BS ever.
it simply HAS to be.
renaming it has to be the biggest BS ever.
it simply HAS to be.
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
I was just kind of like 'Um... bawwww?'
I soz I just don't see why it's such a big deal :/
I soz I just don't see why it's such a big deal :/
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
Didn't you hear what happened when Macy's changed Marshall Field's name?
OHMYGAWD, we Chicagoans were in an uproar. A New York City store taking over and RENAMING a Chicago Icon?
No.
The Sears Tower has been the Sears Tower since it was built.
It's been bought by foreign companies, and now this company comes in and takes up 3% of it and calls it theirs?
No.
Just. No.
OHMYGAWD, we Chicagoans were in an uproar. A New York City store taking over and RENAMING a Chicago Icon?
No.
The Sears Tower has been the Sears Tower since it was built.
It's been bought by foreign companies, and now this company comes in and takes up 3% of it and calls it theirs?
No.
Just. No.
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
Oic. So it's not just the renaming, it's more that they don't even have the right to do it.
I guess we don't really have many icons in the whole of australia, let alone perth, so
I guess we don't really have many icons in the whole of australia, let alone perth, so
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
that's why you should all move here and we'll party and go to the SEARS tower and MARSHALL FIELDS and stuff.
gahhh, haha.
gahhh, haha.
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
RIP Fields.
I don't even shop at Macy's. >:[
Anyway, you get why we're all like ASOFINASO;DFNDFASINFSDLKFJSDLFJ WTF now?
I don't even shop at Macy's. >:[
Anyway, you get why we're all like ASOFINASO;DFNDFASINFSDLKFJSDLFJ WTF now?
Re: Sears Tower Gets Renamed
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Chicagos-Sears-Tower-renamed-apf-3086541074.html?x=0
Ugh, haha. finally.
They're gonna get a lot more hate than looove
Ugh, haha. finally.
They're gonna get a lot more hate than looove
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|